At 2010-07-24 06:16, in response to an e-mail
from Morten Kromberg of Dyalog APL,
I posted the following
article
to the J Programming Forum:
This survey is of course unscientific and biased
(e.g. the people who never took up J
because they can not abide by index origin 0 are unlikely to respond).
I have tabulated the relevant responses
as of 2010-07-26 23:10.
Positive opinions of index origin 0 are marked by
; negative opinions are marked by
. The salient comment in a response
and a link to the response are also included.
| |
Tom Arneson | |
land surveyor | |
I have no problem with J fixing index origin at 0. | |
|
| |
Leigh Halliwell | |
mathematics | |
Occasionally the zero index-origin trips me up;
however, it’s one of the
peculiarities of the language that I accept
in order to use the power of J. | |
|
| |
Jim Russell | |
developer with no formal training | |
Having always considered an index as a way
to express an offset from the “first” item, a 0 index origin is,
to me, the only sensible option. | |
|
| |
Devon McCormick | |
developer with little formal training | |
I find index origin 0 to be the sensible choice, especially given that we
can use _1 to index the last element of an array. | |
|
| |
June Kim | |
? | |
I am okay with index origin 0.
some of my friends, whom I would call ordinary domain experts
without much experience in programming, felt uncomfortable about it,
at least in the beginning. | |
|
| |
Bo Jacoby | |
? | |
| |
|
| |
R.E. Boss | |
mathematician | |
The main reason I would prefer an index origin of 1 is because I expect the
first, second, third, ... element to have index 1, 2, 3, ...
| |
|
| |
Harvey Hahn | |
education, music, etc. | |
Personally, I’ve
always felt that a 0-origin was an awkward concept
There are lots of things in life
you don’t like, but you learn to live with them.
To me, 0-origin is one of them.
| |
|
| |
Henry Rich | |
software | |
I think index origin 0 is perfect.
What we need is a terminology to
replace “first, second, ...etc”.
| |
|
| |
Eldon Eller | |
EE | |
Initially the zero origin bit me once
in while, but it was a most a minor and
transitory annoyance.
| |
|
| |
Neville Holmes | |
systems engineer college teacher | |
I taught J for a decade or more and can’t
recall any problems with fixed origin 0 either in teaching or
in student project work.
| |
|
| |
Graham Parkhouse | |
civil engineer | |
I always used ⎕io as 1 in APL,
so moving to J, this was a major difficulty for me.
I accept that supplying the choice of 0 or 1 is not a
great idea.
| |
|
| |
Steven Taylor | |
? | |
As strange as it sounds, no choice
(with a, “it’s less error prone + more
elegant” hunch esp. when working with others)
gives me a disproportionate amount of clarity and confidence.
| |
|
| |
Zsbán Ambrus | |
mathematics | |
I am disqualified from the survey,
and I find zero based indexing much
more convenient that one based indexing.
| |
|
| |
Michel Dumontier | |
mathematics | |
this fact [index origin 0] was accepted
(acquis in french) for me and I believed the topic closed.
| |
|
| |
Joey Tuttle | |
physics, EE, engineering maths | |
I am happy that j has a single/fixed index origin
and that it is 0.
| |
|
| |
Ian Shannon | |
environmental science | |
0 is the right choice —
it make the calculation of indexes cleaner
| |
|
| |
Chris Burke | |
finance, insurance | |
Since people are born at age 0,
and durations start at time 0, then ⎕io
0 is very much better than ⎕io 1.
Indeed, I would say that incorrect
adjustments for ⎕io 1
(e.g. dat[16] not recognized as the value for
age/duration 15)
was the primary reason for program bugs in that business.
| |
|
| |
Fraser Jackson | |
econometrics statistics | |
I find J fine as it is with a fixed origin 0.
| |
|
| |
Pablo Landherr | |
finance | |
The choice of a fixed value for index origin
in general and 0 in particular
have made a slight majority of problems easier to code in J
compared to APL
(where I did most problem solving prior to J).
| |
|
| |
David Porter | |
EE | |
Having the index
origin set to zero is not a great loss, but it did add one more
annoyance to learning the language.
| |
|
| |
Patrick van Beek | |
actuary | |
I find index 0 difficult to work when working
with arrays in the abstract
but in my work I don’t
find origin 0 a hindrance.
| |
|
| |
Alex Rufon | |
economics | |
a fixed value of 0 is not a hindrance to my work.
| |
|